Janice Griffith Lawsuit: A Comprehensive Overview of Liability and Safety

In April 2014, a photoshoot organized by Hustler magazine at the Hollywood Hills mansion of social media personality Dan Bilzerian quickly turned into a legal matter when model and adult film actress Janice Griffith was thrown off a rooftop into a pool and missed. The incident resulted in a broken foot, an attempt at an out-of-court settlement, and ultimately a civil lawsuit filed in December of that year.

The case drew wide media attention not only because of the celebrities involved, but because it raised fundamental questions about workplace safety, performer consent, and legal liability in the world of entertainment content creation. This article provides a structured, factual overview of the case — who was involved, what happened, where it occurred, who filed the lawsuit, and what legal arguments were made on both sides. It is intended purely for informational purposes and does not represent legal advice of any kind.

Who Is Janice Griffith?

Janice Griffith is an American adult film actress and model who rose to prominence in the adult entertainment industry in the early 2010s. Working under a stage name, she built a following through her work with several major production companies and through social media platforms. Beyond her professional career, Griffith has been recognized as a vocal advocate for performer safety and transparency within the adult film industry values that ultimately became central to the legal action she pursued following the 2014 incident.

At the time of the incident, Griffith was a young performer, a fact that some commentators noted added an additional dimension to questions about the power dynamics present during the photoshoot. Her decision to file the Janice Griffith lawsuit, even after receiving a strongly worded and dismissive response from the defendant’s legal team, was widely reported as a show of resolve.
Have you read our previous Lawsuit Blog- Capital One Outage Class Action Lawsuit

Janice Griffith Lawsuit: Case Overview Table

Who Are the Defendants?

Dan Bilzerian: Dan Bilzerian is a poker player, social media personality, and entrepreneur widely known on Instagram and other platforms for posting content depicting an extravagant lifestyle — private jets, luxury properties, weapons, and high-profile events. At the time of the incident, Bilzerian had millions of followers and was frequently referred to in media as the “King of Instagram.” The photoshoot at his Hollywood Hills home was reportedly organized in part to showcase this lifestyle for Hustler magazine. Bilzerian himself carried out the act of throwing Griffith off the roof, making him a central figure in the Janice Griffith lawsuit.

LFP Internet Group LLC (Hustler Magazine): LFP Internet Group LLC is the parent company of the iconic adult magazine brand Hustler, founded by Larry Flynt. Hustler organized and directed the photoshoot at Bilzerian’s property. According to Griffith’s court filings, Hustler hired her for the shoot, making them an employer of sorts during the event. As the organizer of the stunt, Hustler was named as a co-defendant alongside Bilzerian, with the plaintiff arguing both parties shared responsibility for failing to ensure a safe working environment.

What Happened? — The Incident

On April 23, 2014, Janice Griffith arrived at Dan Bilzerian’s Hollywood Hills mansion for a photoshoot commissioned by Hustler magazine. The concept of the shoot was to capture content highlighting Bilzerian’s lavish lifestyle. As part of the stunt, Bilzerian threw Griffith off the rooftop of the property, intending for her to land in the pool below.

Griffith missed the pool and struck the edge of it, sustaining a broken foot as a result of the impact. The entire incident was recorded on video, which would later become a critical piece of evidence during the legal proceedings. The footage showed both the practice run-throughs before the stunt and the moment the injury occurred. Following the incident, Griffith reached out to Bilzerian’s legal team seeking approximately $85,000 in compensation for medical expenses and lost wages. When negotiations failed to produce a settlement, Griffith moved forward with the Janice Griffith lawsuit.

Where Was the Lawsuit Filed and Who Filed It?

On December 16, 2014, Janice Griffith filed a civil lawsuit — formally styled as Janice Griffith v. LFP Internet Group LLC et al. — in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, in the state of California. The choice of venue was natural, as the incident took place within the jurisdiction of California, and both the defendants operated substantially within the state. Griffith filed the case as the plaintiff, meaning she was the party initiating the legal action. Her complaint alleged negligence and unsafe working conditions against both Dan Bilzerian and LFP Internet Group LLC (Hustler).

Legal Arguments — Both Sides of the Case

Plaintiff’s Position: Griffith’s legal team argued that both Bilzerian and Hustler were negligent in organizing and executing a physically dangerous stunt without adequate safety measures. The claim rested on the idea that the defendants had a duty of care toward Griffith as a performer on their shoot and that they breached this duty by failing to take proper precautions.

Defense’s Position: The defense relied heavily on the legal doctrine of “assumption of risk.” Bilzerian’s legal team argued that Griffith voluntarily agreed to participate in the stunt and was an adult who understood what she was consenting to. In their view, she had knowingly accepted the risks involved. The defense further described the Janice Griffith lawsuit as frivolous, and Bilzerian’s attorney predicted publicly that Griffith would “obviously lose.”

Case Outcome and Resolution

The case did not result in a publicly reported trial verdict. Based on available court records and legal reporting, the matter appears to have been resolved through a settlement or private dismissal, with the specific terms remaining undisclosed. Neither party made public statements confirming the final resolution or any financial outcome. What is clear is that the case proceeded through several formal legal stages before reaching its conclusion.

Conclusion

Summary: In April 2014, Janice Griffith was hired by Hustler magazine for a photoshoot at Dan Bilzerian’s Hollywood Hills home. During the shoot, Bilzerian threw her off a rooftop into a pool; she missed and broke her foot. After a failed attempt to settle for $85,000, Griffith filed a civil personal injury lawsuit in December 2014 against both Bilzerian and LFP Internet Group LLC in Los Angeles Superior Court. The defense argued she assumed the risk by consenting to the stunt. The Janice Griffith lawsuit raised important questions about performer safety, negligence, and consent in entertainment settings. It was reportedly resolved privately, with no publicized verdict or settlement terms disclosed to the public.

Read our latest Post- Justin Billingsley Greene Law